వికీపీడియా:విషయ ప్రాముఖ్యత: కూర్పుల మధ్య తేడాలు
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Svrangarao (చర్చ | రచనలు) ఆంగ్లభాగ తొలగింపు |
|||
| పంక్తి 1: | పంక్తి 1: | ||
{{అనువాదం}} |
|||
{{తయారీలో విధానం}} |
{{తయారీలో విధానం}} |
||
{{Policylist}} |
{{Policylist}} |
||
| పంక్తి 12: | పంక్తి 11: | ||
* ఒక విషయం గురించి విశ్వసనీయమైన ప్రచురణలలో (ఆ సబ్జెక్టుకు సంబంధించిన ప్రత్యేక ప్రచురణలలో కాదు) గణనీయంగా వ్రాయబడితే అది ప్రముఖమైన విషయం అనవచ్చును. |
* ఒక విషయం గురించి విశ్వసనీయమైన ప్రచురణలలో (ఆ సబ్జెక్టుకు సంబంధించిన ప్రత్యేక ప్రచురణలలో కాదు) గణనీయంగా వ్రాయబడితే అది ప్రముఖమైన విషయం అనవచ్చును. |
||
* ''"Significant coverage"'' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]] is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.<ref>Examples: The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on [[IBM]] are plainly non-trivial. The one sentence mention by Walker of the band ''Three Blind Mice'' in a biography of [[Bill Clinton]] ({{cite news|title=Tough love child of Kennedy|author=Martin Walker|date=[[1992-01-06]]|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1240962,00.html}}) is plainly trivial.</ref> |
|||
* ''"Reliable"'' means sources need editorial integrity to allow [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] evaluation of notability, per [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|the reliable source guideline]]. Sources may encompass [[Publication|published]] works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.<ref>Self-promotion, autobiography, and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works should be ''someone else'' writing independently about the topic. The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it. Otherwise, someone could give their own topic as much notability as they want by simply expounding on it outside of Wikipedia, which would defeat the purpose of the concept. Also, neutral sources should exist in order to guarantee a [[WP:NPOV|neutral article]] can be written — self-promotion is ''not'' neutral (obviously), and self-published sources often are biased if even unintentionally: see [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] and [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] for discussion of neutrality concerns of such sources. Even ''non''-promotional self-published sources, in the rare cases they may exist, are still ''not'' evidence of notability as they do not measure the ''attention a subject has received by the world at large''.</ref> |
|||
* ''"Sources,"''<ref>Including but not limited to newspapers, books and e-books, magazines, television and radio documentaries, reports by government agencies, scientific journals, etc. In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a comprehensive article.</ref> defined on Wikipedia as [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources]], provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred.<ref>Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. Mere republications of a single source or news wire service do not always constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing articles in the same geographic region about an occurrence, does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Specifically, several journals publishing the same article within the same geographic region from a news wire service is not a multiplicity of works.</ref> |
|||
* ''"Independent of the subject"'' excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, [[WP:SPS|self-published]] material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.<ref>Works produced by the subject, or those with a strong connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of interest by the world at large. See also: [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] for handling of such situations.</ref> |
|||
* ''"Presumed"'' means that substantive coverage [[WP:RS|in reliable sources]] establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, of notability. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not suitable for inclusion. For example, it may violate [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]].<ref>Moreover, not all coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].</ref> |
|||
A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice, and satisfies one of the criteria for a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia. Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article. |
|||
== <span id="OBJ" /> విషయ ప్రాముఖ్యత నిర్ధారణకు అబ్జెక్టివ్ ఆధారాలు అవసరం == |
|||
విషయ ప్రాముఖ్యత నిబంధనలన్నింటికీ మూలసూత్రం - ప్రాముఖ్యతను నిర్ధారించగల అబ్జెక్టివ్ ఆధారాలు The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability. Substantial coverage in reliable sources constitutes such objective evidence, as do published peer recognition and the other factors listed in the subject specific guidelines. |
|||
[[WP:NOT#NEWS|వికీపీడియా వార్తల సంగ్రహం కాదు]]: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability. The Wikimedia project [[wikinews:Main page|Wikinews]] covers topics of present news coverage. |
|||
==Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines== |
|||
Although articles should demonstrate the notability of their topics, and articles on topics that do not meet this criterion are generally deleted, it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be. When discussing whether to delete or merge an article due to non-notability, the discussion should focus not only on whether notability is established in the article, but on what the probability is that notability could be established. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate unless active effort has been made to find these sources. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort. |
|||
If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or: |
|||
*Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject<ref>Sometimes contacting the subject of a biography or the representative of a subject organization will yield independent source material. Of course we have to be careful to observe and evaluate independence. You might also see if there is a wikipedia project related to the topic, and ask for help there.</ref> for advice on where to look for sources. |
|||
*Put the {{tl|notability}} tag on the article to alert other editors. |
|||
*If the article is about a specialized field, use the {{tl|expert-subject|PROJECT-NAME}} tag with a specific [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] not available online. |
|||
If appropriate sources cannot be found, consider [[Help:Merging and moving pages|merging]] the article's content into a broader article providing context.<ref>For instance, articles on minor characters in a work of fiction may be merged into a "list of minor characters in ..."; articles on schools may be merged into articles on the towns or regions where schools are located; relatives of a famous person may be merged into the article on the person; articles on persons only notable for being associated with a certain group or event may be merged into the main article on that group or event.</ref> Otherwise, if deleting:<ref>Wikipedia editors have been known to reject nominations for deletion that have been inadequately researched. Research should include attempts to find sources which might demonstrate notability, and/or information which would demonstrate notability in another manner.</ref> |
|||
*If the article meets our [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], one can use a criterion-specific deletion tag listed on that page. |
|||
*Use the {{tl|prod}} tag, for articles which do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but are uncontroversial deletion candidates. This allows the article to be deleted after five days if nobody objects. For more information, see [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion]]. |
|||
*For cases where you are unsure about deletion or believe others might object, nominate the article for the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] process, where the merits will be debated and deliberated for five days. |
|||
== <span id="TEMP" />Notability is not temporary == |
|||
If a subject has met the general notability guideline, there is no need to show continual coverage or interest in the topic, though subjects that do not meet the guideline at one point in time may do so as time passes and more sources come into existence. However, articles should not be written based on [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball|speculation]] that the topic may receive additional coverage in the future. |
|||
== <span id="NCONTENT" />Notability of article content == |
|||
The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough to be a separate article in Wikipedia. Notability, in the sense used to determine article inclusion, does not directly affect article content. |
|||
But the term "notability" is still used in the sense of "importance" to describe the level of detail that is appropriate for an encyclopedic summary. Treat each aspect with a [[WP:DUE|weight]] appropriate to its significance to the subject. Attend to anything that may construe undue weight, including depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements. Keep in mind that an encyclopedia article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404|not a complete exposition]] of all possible details.<ref>See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404]]</ref> For example, the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability guideline for people]] states that lists of people are not meant to be exhaustive.<ref>See [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Lists of people]]</ref> |
|||
Article content is also governed by various [[:Category:Wikipedia content policy|content policies]]. |
|||
06:24, 21 డిసెంబరు 2008 నాటి కూర్పు
ఇది తయారీలో ఉన్న విధానం దీనిని ఉపయోగకరంగా తీర్చి దిద్దేందుకు సహకరించండి. ఇది ఇంకా నిశ్చయమైన విధానం కాదు.
|
తెలుగు వికీపీడియాలో ఒక వ్యాసం ఉండదగినదా లేదా అన్న విషయం బేరీజు వేయడానికి ఆ వియం ప్రాముఖ్యతను పరిగణనలోకి తీసుకోవాలి. "ప్రాముఖ్యత" అంటే ప్రసిద్ధి, ప్రజాదరణ, ఉన్నత స్థానం అని కాదు. అయితే ఈ పదాల మధ్య తప్పకుండా కొంత సంబంధం ఉంటుంది. ఇందుకు అదనంగా వికీపీడియా వ్యాసాలకు తటస్థ దృక్కోణం, నిర్ధారింప తగినది, మౌలిక పరిశోధనలు నిషిద్ధం అనే మౌలిక నిబంధనలు ఉన్నాయని మరచిపోవద్దు. అయితే, తటస్థ దృక్కోణంలో వ్రాసి, నిర్ధారింపదగినదై, ఇంతకు ముందు ప్రచురింపబడినంత మాత్రాన అది "ప్రాముఖ్యత" కలిగినది అని చెప్పడానికి వీలు లేదు.
ఈ "ప్రాముఖ్యత" అనే అంశం వ్యాసాలు వేటి గురించి ఉండవచ్చునో అనే సందిగ్ధాన్ని తీర్చడానికి మాత్రమే. వ్యాసంలో వ్రాసన విషయానికి మాత్రం. తటస్థ దృక్కోణం, నిర్ధారింప తగినది, మౌలిక పరిశోధనలు నిషిద్ధం అనే నియమాలు వర్తిస్తాయి.
ప్రాముఖ్యతను గుర్తించే అంశాలు
ఆంగ్ల వికీలో "Notability" కి ఇచ్చిన ప్రమాణాలు ఇవి.
- ఒక విషయం గురించి విశ్వసనీయమైన ప్రచురణలలో (ఆ సబ్జెక్టుకు సంబంధించిన ప్రత్యేక ప్రచురణలలో కాదు) గణనీయంగా వ్రాయబడితే అది ప్రముఖమైన విషయం అనవచ్చును.
Notes
Wikipedia key policies and guidelines | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content |
| ||||||||
| Conduct |
| ||||||||
| Deletion |
| ||||||||
| Enforcement |
| ||||||||
| Editing |
| ||||||||
| Project content |
| ||||||||
| WMF |
| ||||||||
