క్లెయిర్‌వాయెన్స్

క్లెయిర్‌వాయెన్స్ అనేది శాస్త్రీయంగా నిరూపితమైన అనుభూతుల ద్వారా పొందడం అసాధ్యమని భావించే సమాచారాన్ని కూడా పొందగల సామర్థ్యం. అందువలననే దీనిని ఎక్స్‌ట్రాసెన్సరీ పర్సెప్షన్ (అతీంద్రియ జ్ఞానం) లేదా "సిక్స్త్ సెన్స్"గా పేర్కొంటారు.^[1]^[2] అటువంటి సామర్థ్యాన్ని కలిగిన ఏ వ్యక్తి అయినా క్లైర్‌వాయెంట్ (స్పష్టంగా చూసేవాడు) అంటారు.^[3]

దివ్యదృష్టి వంటి పారానార్మల్, అతీంద్రియ సామర్థ్యాల ఉనికికి సంబంధించిన వాదనలకు శాస్త్రీయ ఆధారాల మద్ధతు లేదు.^[4] పారాసైకాలజీ ఈ అవకాశాన్ని అన్వేషిస్తుంది. అయితే పారానార్మల్ ఉనికిని శాస్త్రీయ సమాజం అంగీకరించలేదు.^[5] వైజ్ఞానిక సమాజం పారాసైకాలజీని విస్తృతంగా పరిగణిస్తుంది, ఇందులో దివ్యదృష్టి అధ్యయనం, ఒక సూడోసైన్స్.

మూలాలు

↑ మూస:Cite Merriam-Webster "Clairvoyance - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary". Archived from the original on February 27, 2012. Retrieved October 6, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
↑ "clairvoyance". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on February 18, 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-07. The ESP entry includes clairvoyance.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
↑ "clairvoyant". Oxford Learners Dictionaries. Retrieved 2017-04-08.
↑ Carroll, Robert Todd. (2003). "Clairvoyance". Retrieved 2014-04-30.
↑
- Bunge, Mario. (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Springer. p. 226. ISBN 90-277-1635-8 "Despite being several thousand years old, and having attracted a large number of researchers over the past hundred years, we owe no single firm finding to parapsychology: no hard data on telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, or psychokinesis."
- Stenger, Victor. (1990). Physics and Psychics: The Search for a World Beyond the Senses. Prometheus Books. p. 166. ISBN 0-87975-575-X "The bottom line is simple: science is based on consensus, and at present a scientific consensus that psychic phenomena exist is still not established."
- Zechmeister, Eugene; Johnson, James. (1992). Critical Thinking: A Functional Approach. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. p. 115. ISBN 0534165966 "There exists no good scientific evidence for the existence of paranormal phenomena such as ESP. To be acceptable to the scientific community, evidence must be both valid and reliable."
- Hines, Terence. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. p. 144. ISBN 1-57392-979-4 "It is important to realize that, in one hundred years of parapsychological investigations, there has never been a single adequate demonstration of the reality of any psi phenomenon."

[1] మూస:Cite Merriam-Webster "Clairvoyance - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary". Archived from the original on February 27, 2012. Retrieved October 6, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)

[2] "clairvoyance". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on February 18, 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-07. The ESP entry includes clairvoyance.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)

[3] "clairvoyant". Oxford Learners Dictionaries. Retrieved 2017-04-08.

[skepdic1-4] Carroll, Robert Todd. (2003). "Clairvoyance". Retrieved 2014-04-30.

[5] 
Bunge, Mario. (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Springer. p. 226. ISBN 90-277-1635-8 "Despite being several thousand years old, and having attracted a large number of researchers over the past hundred years, we owe no single firm finding to parapsychology: no hard data on telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, or psychokinesis."

Stenger, Victor. (1990). Physics and Psychics: The Search for a World Beyond the Senses. Prometheus Books. p. 166. ISBN 0-87975-575-X "The bottom line is simple: science is based on consensus, and at present a scientific consensus that psychic phenomena exist is still not established."

Zechmeister, Eugene; Johnson, James. (1992). Critical Thinking: A Functional Approach. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. p. 115. ISBN 0534165966 "There exists no good scientific evidence for the existence of paranormal phenomena such as ESP. To be acceptable to the scientific community, evidence must be both valid and reliable."

Hines, Terence. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. p. 144. ISBN 1-57392-979-4 "It is important to realize that, in one hundred years of parapsychological investigations, there has never been a single adequate demonstration of the reality of any psi phenomenon."

[6] Bunge, Mario. (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Springer. p. 226. ISBN 90-277-1635-8 "Despite being several thousand years old, and having attracted a large number of researchers over the past hundred years, we owe no single firm finding to parapsychology: no hard data on telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, or psychokinesis."

[7] Stenger, Victor. (1990). Physics and Psychics: The Search for a World Beyond the Senses. Prometheus Books. p. 166. ISBN 0-87975-575-X "The bottom line is simple: science is based on consensus, and at present a scientific consensus that psychic phenomena exist is still not established."

[8] Zechmeister, Eugene; Johnson, James. (1992). Critical Thinking: A Functional Approach. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. p. 115. ISBN 0534165966 "There exists no good scientific evidence for the existence of paranormal phenomena such as ESP. To be acceptable to the scientific community, evidence must be both valid and reliable."

[9] Hines, Terence. (2003). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. p. 144. ISBN 1-57392-979-4 "It is important to realize that, in one hundred years of parapsychological investigations, there has never been a single adequate demonstration of the reality of any psi phenomenon."

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]