వికీపీడియా నుండి
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Pp-move-indef".

 Main page Posts Archived posts Resources Templates Barnstars Members Talk page 


Please place new posts at the top of the list.

2014 posts[మార్చు]


  • Applied Bunch of Special Means - Article is likely about a notable topic but is incomprehensible as written. It was almost certainly created by someone whose first language is not English. Even the title may be a poor translation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)



2013 posts[మార్చు]



  • Shit - Has a cleanup tag placed in June 2011, with no specific cleanup rationale provided. Immediate cleanup matters from my assessment here involve copy editing and adding sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:08, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Baz Mohammad Mubariz - where to start? No paragraphs, no sections, no sources, no wikilinks, no indication of importance or notability. Might even be a speedy. MaxBrowne (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Update: The article was deleted per the delete result at the article's AfD discussion. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
I've performed some preliminary cleanup. The article would certainly benefit from improved sourcing and further copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
I did some minor copy editing. The article still needs more sources. Bold Edits (talk) 19:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Merlin Entertainments - I just fixed a few glaring syntax errors (like two headings not having the same number of equals signs (=) on both sides, and a few wiki-links with a similar problem of not having the same number of brackets on both sides), but I'm sure there are many more. Most of these errors are in the "Operations" section". Of course, that section also has no citations at all... --V2Blast (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)



  • Sierra Madre Ground Warbler - I created the article because one on this bird had not been created yet. If someone could help with adding more information and material that would be great. Andise1 (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Narayan Dutt Shrimali - An article about an Indian astrologer. Please check for notability and consider deletion. It has lots of material with no citations. - Kenfyre (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I've removed the unsourced promotional content and stubbed it; the subject seems notable enough when I tried searching. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
  • B. F. Skinner - Wierd formatting, possible inaccuracy, and a lot of section moving needed. Also might consider a semi-protect for a *lot* of vandalism. Kingsocarso (talk) 22:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Fooding - Several cleanup issues, including unformatted lists and many bare urls, both in the article and in the references section. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Ducati V-twin motorcycles - Tagged as being primarily in list format that may be better-presented in prose style; the "Bevel gear driven valves" section tagged as too long and as possibly needing rewriting. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Miss Nepal 2004 - Formatting; a lot of text is unnecessarily in bold typeface. Unsourced. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Chinese space program - The "History and recent developments" section is tagged as needing copy editing and to possibly be rewritten. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


  • Italian festivals - Several issues; needs formatting, has no sources, few other articles link to it. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Lowell Milken - The cleanup banner has been on this page since April 2013 regarding additional editors to qualify for a neutral point of view. There are also references that require proper sourcing. Perhaps some other editors can attend to the references on this page? Sarahkeen (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Hiv impact of education in ethiopia - Very essayish, needs extreme copyediting and retitling. Probably should also be expanded to worldwide scope, or at least a larger region than just Ethiopia.-- Brainy J ~~ (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I changed the title to Relationship between education and HIV/AIDS.-- Brainy J ~~ (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Has numerous amounts of speculative information from various unreliable paranormal websites. Also prone to drive-by additions, need a massive cleanup and removal of such content based on unreliable sources; watchlisting will also help. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Tagged for cleanup since July 2007. Unsourced. Needs copy editing and the addition of sections to better-organize content. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


  • Ram Revilla, already a poorly written article, has been bombarded with massive amounts of unsourced detail that is probably a violation of WP:BLP. I recommend the page be stripped of all the huge cruft, with the needed information carefully reinserted. Beerest355 Talk 17:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Removed some unsourced trivia and obituary-like information. Also rearranged the sections and did some minor formatting. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Rasoolpur needs an assessment of notability, fact checking, NPOV and citations. Kenfyre 17:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I've cleaned it up, but managed to find two not so good sources for it. It goes back to a stub. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Roulette needs to be checked for mathematical accuracy: there are numerous errors.
  • List of water parks - General layout cleanup, organization and improved sourcing. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Silva Method - Grammar needs fixing. Article is more about José Silva than the Silva Method. Content about the method itself is mostly not encyclopaedic (e.g. list of countries). The Navbox template adds little value. Stelio (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
  • J. Sussman, Inc.- Needs a page cleanup jls738
Did some minor formatting, couldn't see any major clean-up problem. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Already done thanks to another editor. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


Page has been fixed up. Tinton5 (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)



Attempted to lessen the one-sided, grandiloquent writing by (hopefully) removing personal observation, interpretation, and synthesis. Not perfect by any stretch. More help is welcomed! :D Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


  • Had a go at it. I think that someone else may have already gone through and attempted Wikification. Chri$topher 12:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I worked on grammar and punctuation along with others and that seems to be handled.Coaster92 (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


I copyedited the whole thing, formatted all of the sources properly, added an infobox, started the talk page with a header that it was under the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, and added a stub tag at the bottom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 16:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
  • New Jersey Turnpike - needs additional sources and formatting improvements. In addition, consistency with naming conventions such as the word "exit" (like in exit 5), the "E" should be lowercase in the body and lead. Footnote number 22 needs to be replaced with a more reliable source. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Garden State Parkway - needs extra sources, formatting improvements, and consistency with naming conventions throughout. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Belt Parkway - extra sources are needed, especially in "history" section. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Skye Townsend - needs additional sources and minor formatting improvements, also needs more categories. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Cleaned up a bit, and added categories. Tinton5 (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Dingo - the body is great and I can fix any little errors, but I have no idea how to tackle a monster like the lead. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 16:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Somerset House - much of the prose is essay-like, and in need of verifiable sources.Trillig (talk) 14:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
I've performed page cleanup and some copy editing; the article would still benefit from more copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
I've cleaned up grammar and syntax and removed the copy edit tag. I don't know how to show a strike-through of this project here.Coaster92 (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Chach Nama and related articles - article and related ones regarding a chronicle of 7th-century India. Though listed as low-importance, there are abundant resources regarding this period of history and the articles could use better sourcing, restructuring, and content additions. dci | TALK 16:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Indian Institute of Planning and Management - cleanup tagged since December 2009. NPOv issues:favors IIPM in almost all topics. Advert templates. Controversy section and dubious citations. Primary sources. Tall claims.--Nizil (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Law of value - A subject of extreme WP:OWN as shown by the talk page. One of the largest articles on Wikipedia and is likely filled with original research. It needs to be condensed, made understandable and neutral.--Neoconfederate (talk) 00:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


(req. 2012-01-13) Article exists, but it is mostly machine translation. It needs editing by someone who can compare the French article to the English article and edit the English one. Note: This entry was initially posted by another editor at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Arts and entertainment/Film, radio and television, which I've moved here. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Needs to be completely rewritten. It is not easy to read, nor are there any paragraphs. Rainbow Shifter (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Incomprehensible. Problems compounded by personal lack of knowledge of the movie, and inexperienced editors. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Re-wrote the entire article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Would benefit from a complete rewrite. Numerous issues tags at top. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Needs better organization and the addition of sections, disambiguation in some of its links, and currently has no inline citations. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Needs a complete rewrite. Article written as if an advertisement, information is not well organized, and some points are difficult to understand if not already knowledgeable of the topic. Timeraner (talk) 06:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 
Needs better organization with the addition of sections, page layout improvements and inline citations. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 posts[మార్చు]


Has numerous clean-up issues, per tags on the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:35, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


This article is full of original uncited research. Would benefit from a complete work-over to make sure what is said is factually backed. 12:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
A long article that lacks appropriate inline citations. The plot section would benefit from abbreviation, and the article contains too much unsourced fancruft information. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
This article about an Indian village would benefit from being edited for content, context, and formatting. While informative, it lacks citations.
To much information. The article is somewhat spammed with excess information which can be deemed as irrelevant to the general public. Sources not states throughout the majority of the article.
  • Toonami (Asia) This Article is about an upcoming television channel in South-East Asia. Help me to match it with Wikipedia Wiki Verification.
Article removed. 4DHS (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I removed the strike-out that was previously in place for this article above; the article exists (appears to have been recreated) and remains in need of work. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have any sources you could provide that would suggest this claim? 4DHS (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


Much uncited material. Confusing. Self-published sources. It's difficult to find good sources; Google searches turn up Investopedia, sites promoting various financial products, "standby letter of credit" scams, and other junk sources.   It's a real topic, but probably needs to be cited to some offline book. This needs attention by a financial professional. John Nagle (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
It was ok before but recently editors have been adding information about the station's day-to-day business which is really not that interesting or notable and reads more like a logbook than an article. CodeCat (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
No inline citations. 3 Further reading section entries exist that may possibly be usable to improve the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC) 
Lead requires expansion. Needs more inline citations per "citation needed" tags.
Nearly 3x length of lead. Could still use some work, but much better than what it was. ComfyKem (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Several clean-up matters tagged atop the article. 
Would benefit from expansion. Has exactly one source as of this post.
The article's sourcing has been improved, and it has been slightly expanded. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Northamerica1000(talk) 13:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Almost completely rewritten. — Hex (❝?!❞) 10:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)


Has bare urls. Tagged as being essay-like. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Tagged for reading like an advertisement. Has many bare urls.
Tagged for possible copyright violations. Would benefit from page layout clean-up.  పరిష్కరింపబడినది
Clean-up tag requests technical information to be merged into table(s).
Bare urls.  పరిష్కరింపబడినది (bare urls have been cleaned-up)
Bare urls.  పరిష్కరింపబడినది (bare urls have been cleaned-up) 
— Above posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 20:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


Tagged for cleanup as having an inadequate lead section. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Tagged for cleanup as having an inadequate lead section. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
No lead section, weak sourcing, would also benefit from page layout cleanup and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


  • Bondo (putty) Generally sloppy. Only one citation. Very biased tone. Information about the product is very limited and does not include information about other products in the Bondo line (fiberglass filler, plastic filler, etc.) or any history on the brand. Not much information on how it works or why it is used (it is also extensively used for sculpture and modification of consumer goods). Doesn't even contain a link to the product web page. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
I added a few sources to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Rue21 Generally sloppy, reads like an advertisement. JEMdev (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The layout has been cleaned-up, and the article has been copy-edited to reduce promotional tone. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


Too much neutrally disputed content to me to cleanup....--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 05:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

cleaned up.--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Would benefit from general cleanup, copy editing, more inline citations and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
The article is in desperate need of wikification, and from a little research seems incomplete. User:Bilky_askoTalk Pagé 09:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
An historic festival at Iowa State University founded in 1922. Needs copy-editing, the addition of inline citations and general clean-up. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Needs significant copy editing, it's written like an essay and needs more sources and inline citations. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Layout is cleaned up. Still needs work. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


Cleaned up the layout. The article still needs more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Raw water - Cleanup required, several links just copied in and written to sound like an advertisement.
The article has been cleaned-up by other users and in some edits I have done. The article would still benefit from more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
The article would benefit from copy editing, layout cleanup and more specific sourcing. There's some information on the article's talk page regarding the latter within this comment. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


Was merged to Saga of the Skolian Empire. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Unreferenced. No sections. Needs copy editing; may contain original research.
The article has been cleaned up. However it could still be reviewed and have more references.Moony22(talk) 20:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Lede section needs expansion. Unreferenced. History section would benefit from better organization and subsections. 
Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement. Unreferenced. Could use better organization.
Would benefit from page layout cleanup and copy editing. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement.
Could use page and image layout cleanup. Unreferenced.
Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Needs better organization into sections. Has bare urls and needs more sources. 
  • Have done some preliminary cleanup on the Roland Rat article. Fixed bare urls, added sections. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
The above 6 entries were posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I like the idea of cleaning up this - if no one else is going to I'll take a look over the next few weeks (will take me a while to do it right)-- 🍺 Antiqueight confer 12:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Metabolic window - Very badly constructed and poorly written. Sources listed by last name in the article, but not present in Notes or References section. Looks like the original writer wrote one thing and someone else "updated" it contradicting the original. It's just sloppy. Milhisfan (talk) 09:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
The article has been cleaned up as of the time of this post. It would benefit from further copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Ike & Tina Turner- I tagged this a while back as having multiple issues, the templates have been removed but it's not much better as far as I can see. Sloppily written and poorly researched with barely any citations. I stand by my comments in the talk section Kaleeyed (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Cassette culture - Needs some work. Kaleeyed (talk) 12:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Solomon Burke - How long have you got? Going to be a Herculean task this one, it really needs hacking back and surplus information moving to other articles. It's out of control. Kaleeyed (talk) 12:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Cleaned up. A long article with 500 inline citations at this time. The article would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


  • Burton upon Trent I just looked at this article and did a bit of rearranging, but I think it's struggling a bit and could do with some help. This could be a really great article but at the moment it's pretty weakly written and lacks some research. Thought I'd draw some people's attention to it. Kaleeyed (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

This article is full of OR/POV and unsourced sections and statements. There seems to be a massive left-wing bias in this article and I feel it needs thorough scrutiny. Thank you. Christian1985 (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

No references. Would benefit from copy-editing and better organization.

Could use copy-editing for cohesion and to clean-up grammatical choppiness. Needs more references.

Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

“Functions” section in list format; would benefit from conversion to prose. Only one reference, and no inline citations.

Unreferenced. Would benefit from copy-editing and formatting. Only one article links to it.

Has only three inline citations; needs more. May contain original research.

Cleaned up. Needs more citations and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Needs expansion; has seven listed sources that could be used to expand the article with inline citations.

Cleaned up. 

Article would benefit from copy-editing for cohesion; prose is choppy. References section needs copy-editing. Article needs more inline citations

Cleaned up. Could still use more sources and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Article has only one reference, would benefit from copy-editing, and may contain original research. The article would also benefit from some reduction and better summarization of technical information. Bare URLs need cleaning-up.

Needs more references and inline citations. Could use better organization and copy-editing for cohesion. Currently has no images.

Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Tables need layout formatting and clean-up. Only has one reference/inline citation. No assigned WikiProjects on talk page.

Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would improve the article. References section needs copy-editing. Needs inline citations.

Art section is very long, somewhat choppy, would benefit from copy-editing and formatting. Other areas are also choppy; consolidation of information into paragraphs would be an improvement. Article has many empty sections that need to be populated with sourced information. Bare URLs need cleaning up. Needs more references and inline citations.

—The above 12 posts are from Northamerica1000(talk) 10:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I've done some preliminary clean-up to the page's layout and added the "expert attention requested" template. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


  • The Sopranos: The whole article is unbelievably laboured throughout. Extent of content in Info' box has been discussed previously, and has been debated extensively but to no avail, thanks to the aggressive participation of non-registered IPs. Suggest partial protection before attempting editing on this article. A project on which I would then be more than pleased to participate.
--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Have you tried requesting protection at WP:RFPP? -- œ 02:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

మూస:DeindentI have just put in a request for Temporary semi-protection. I should like to thank El duderino, and everyone else who has helped on The Sopranos since 25 February 2012 (UTC)--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

The Sopranos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)[మార్చు]
Indefinite semi-protection:
Persistent sockpuppetry. Repeated deletion of sourced material by new editors. Persistent vandalism. I have had help from the Wikipedia:Cleanup Project (since February 25) and I should welcome your help in maintaining this article. Thank you, Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayjg (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Added a reference:

"China National Tea Museum". China.org.cn. October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 17, 2012. External link in |publisher= (help) (Includes text and video). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The link China National Tea Museum is functional as of the time of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Lede is short. Tagged for tone and neutrality issues. Information could be better-organized into sections and subsections.

Lede is very short. Much content is in list format; conversion to prose may benefit the article. Additional inline citations are needed.

History section is very choppy, could use organization and consolidation into paragraphs. Most of the article is within its "History" section; better organization with new sections may be an improvement. Much of the content is missing inline citations.

No lede. Entirely in list format (no prose). Unreferenced.


Added lede to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Unreferenced. Citations and clarification needed. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose may be an improvement. Article tagged as providing insufficient context.

Lede is very short. List formatting could use conversion to prose.

Some sections are very long without any inline citations, could use some reduction. Article has no inline citations. "Assets" section could use rewriting to clarify the content.

Prose is choppy, much of the article is in list format, which may be better as prose. The verifiability of the article is tagged as disputed. Unreferenced as of this post.

Northamerica1000(talk) 0:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

*Jeanie Johnston - "Personal communication" as a reference. Would someone please look at (and probably revert) this edit of Jeanie Johnston [6] I would explain that <ref>{{Personal communication, Aiseanna Mara Teoranta}}</ref> is not acceptable, (and it is tagged as such), but in the light of the reason given for the changes: (I reverted some of user Lugnad's changes, as he or she deleted withouth comment several unfavourable, but researched and sourced facts about the ship. Also fixed some typos.) It might be better received from someone other than I. Just to add, I have no idea what changes of mine are being referred to. Thanks, Lugnad (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding Lugnad (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've chopped the pers. comm. ref and claim. Bet it comes back. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Could use some copy editing. Some sections need more references. Some of the references need better formatting. The article would benefit from some of the information being condensed. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

The article has significant lists that could be changed to prose. Could use more references. Could use images. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Open University of Sudan - A user that seems to be related to this university added lots of content. First I've rollbacked it, than I've replaced and fixed it as a minor layout copyedit. All this content is related to this university and may be useful but I still have the doubt that it's wroten as a sort of Brochure. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Information very likely copied and pasted, or written verbatim per University literature has been removed. The article is now a stub. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Don't know where to start.. -- œ 14:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

No lede section. Empty "births" section. Unreferenced. Needs more references. Would benefit from summaries preceding the list information in its sections.


Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

No lede section. Some of the content in the "History of early classical guitar recordings" section may be better rewritten in a list format.


Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

An article about a company that develops and markets environmentally friendly power and propulsion systems for ships and other vessels. The article is tagged as written like an advertisement, could use some rewriting. I added a few references to the article, which could be used for more inline citations.

The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The "Public Facilities" and "Other statistics" sections are entirely in list format. Article could use more inline citations, references.

Northamerica1000(talk) 01:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Archived posts[మార్చు]

For older entries, please refer to the project's archives. వికీపీడియా:Cleanup/Resources వికీపీడియా:Cleanup/Members వికీపీడియా:Cleanup/Templates వికీపీడియా:Cleanup/Barnstars

WikiProjects puzzle Related WikiProjects[మార్చు]

See also[మార్చు]

an inactive task force

Icon tools.png Tools[మార్చు]

Main tool page: toolserver.org

A user script that helps to automatically make clean-up changes in articles, and it also allows for easy design, use, and customization of user scripts related to automated article cleanup.

Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references

Edit and repair external links

Quickly resolve ambiguous links.

Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.

Directory Directory of WikiProjects


Council WikiProject Council


Guide Guide to WikiProjects