What to type |
What it makes |
Where it goes
|
{{Multiple issues}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
- Use the
section=y parameter if you use the template for a particular section.
- To tag a specific issue, set any string of text to the parameter, such as
issue=y
- To specify the month tagged for the categories that sort articles by month, type
issue=జనవరి 2021 or issue=April 2007
|
Top of article or section with three or more issues
|
{{Unreferenced}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages.
|
{{Refimprove}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Possibly inaccurate articles top
|
{{Cite check}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited.
|
{{Original research}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Possible original research.
|
{{Synthesis}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Possible unpublished synthesis. (The text in quotation marks is replaced with the title of the article.)
|
{{Science review}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| This article or section reads like a scientific review article. It potentially contains biased syntheses of primary sources.Please replace inadequate primary references with secondary sources such as scientific review articles. See the talk page for details. |
|
Top of articles or sections
|
{{Advert}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Pages that promote commercial products or services
|
{{Magazine}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia.
|
{{Fanpov}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia.
|
{{Story}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| ఈ వ్యాసం విజ్ఞాన సర్వస్వ వ్యాసం లాగా కాక, ఓ కథ లాగా ఉంది. వికీపీడియా నాణ్యతా ప్రమాణాలకు అనుగుణంగా ఉండడం కోసము, తటస్థంగా ఉండడం కోసమూ వ్యక్తిగత అభిరుచిలో ఉన్న వ్యాస ధోరణిని సవరించి, వికీ సాంప్రదాయిక ధోరణికి మార్చండి. (February 2013) |
|
Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information.
|
{{Content}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is disputed. The information may have been removed or included by an editor as a result. Please see discussion on the talk page considering whether its inclusion is warranted. (February 2013) |
|
Above the site of dispute in article or section
|
{{weasel}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| ఈ వ్యాసంలో అస్పష్టమైన, సంశయాత్మక పదాలను వాడారు: ఇలాంటి పదాలు సాధరణంగా పక్షపాతంతో కూడుకుని గానీ, నిర్ధారించుకోలేని సమాచారంతో కూడుకుని గానీ ఉంటాయి. అలాంటి సమాచారాన్ని తగు మూలాలతో విశదీకరించాలి లేదా తొలగించాలి. (February 2013) |
|
Article or section that has weasel words
|
{{peacock}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| ఈ వ్యాసంలోని పదజాలం అంశాన్ని వ్యక్తిగత ధోరణిలో వాస్తవిక సమాచారంతో సంబంధం లేకుండా ప్రశంసిస్తున్న ధోరణిలో ఉంది. దయచేసి అంశం ప్రాముఖ్యతను అటువంటి పదజాలం ద్వారా కాక వాటిని తొలగించడమో, మార్చడమో చేసి, అంశం ప్రాముఖ్యతను వాస్తవాలు, తగిన వ్యాఖ్యల ఆధారంగా వివరించండి. (February 2013) |
|
Article or section that has peacock terms
|
{{Missing information|Info}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion
|
{{Self-published|Source}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy.
|
{{Incoherent}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message
|
{{Recentism}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
|
Top of article, or top of section in dispute.
|
{{Undue|article}} {{Undue|section}} {{Emphasis|article}} {{Emphasis|section}}
Edit
Talk
Links
|
| This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, controversies or matters relative to the article subject as a whole. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. |
|
Sections or text where a matter such as a controversy or incident has been given more weight than is appropriate in the context of the article or biography as a whole.
|